Modern dental implantology is developing at an extremely rapid pace. New materials, digital planning methods, and the emergence of artificial intelligence open possibilities for even more precise and predictable treatment. The latest issue of Scientific Highlights (3/2025, Straumann) presents several key directions that are changing practice today.
Titanium-Zirconium Implants: Greater Chances of Osseointegration
A study by Ann Mary Varghese (2025) compared the osseointegration of bone cells on the surface of traditional titanium implants (cpTi) and titanium-zirconium alloy (Ti-Zr).
The results showed:
• implants made of Ti-Zr alloy provide significantly higher adhesion of osteoblasts;
• the best cell integration occurred in the “valleys” of the implant threads;
• this creates prerequisites for faster and more reliable osseointegration.
Conclusion: titanium-zirconium surfaces potentially provide better long-term stability, especially in patients with increased demands for reliability.
Digital Dentistry: A New Standard in Complex Cases
An article by Ignacio Pedrinaci (2025) demonstrated how modern digital protocols are transforming dental practice:
• 3D planning and navigation guides allow implants to be placed with maximum precision, even in difficult aesthetic zones;
• digital surgical templates help predict the final outcome even before the surgery begins;
• the use of digital prototypes (MAPs) improves communication with the patient and minimizes the risk of errors.
Conclusion: digital dentistry makes treatment more predictable and transparent for both the doctor and the patient.
30 Years of Success with Emdogain: Tissue Regeneration
Over the last three decades, enamel matrix derivative (EMD, Emdogain) has become one of the most important biomaterials in regenerative periodontology.
• stimulates the formation of new cementum and periodontal fibers;
• promotes bone regeneration;
• has proven effectiveness in the treatment of periodontal defects and in working with soft tissues.
Conclusion: Emdogain continues to remain the gold standard in bio-regeneration.
Accuracy of Guided Implant Placement: Straumann vs. Camlog Systems
In a clinical study (Böse et al., 2025), the accuracy of two computer-guided systems was compared:
• Straumann Bone Level Tapered (S-BLT)
• Camlog Screw Line (C-SL)
The results showed:
• deviations during implant placement were minimal (0.6–1.2 mm);
• both systems provided high accuracy, regardless of the surgeon’s experience.
Conclusion: digital planning guarantees predictable treatment quality, even in the hands of less experienced clinicians.
Immediate Implantation: Intact or Damaged Sockets?
A systematic review (Ickroth et al., 2025) compared the outcomes of implantation immediately after tooth extraction:
• in “healthy” (intact) vs. “damaged” (non-intact) sockets.
Conclusions:
• implant survival exceeded 90% in all groups;
• differences in outcomes were minimal;
• however, the quality of studies is still limited, and additional evidence is needed.
Artificial Intelligence: The Future of Implantology
A review by Vázquez-Sebrango (2025) showed that AI is already actively used in:
• diagnostics,
• implant planning,
• outcome prediction,
• automated analysis of 2D and 3D images.
Although the field is still young and studies carry a risk of bias, the development prospects are enormous.
General Conclusion
Modern implantology stands on three pillars:
1. New materials (titanium-zirconium) for improved osseointegration.
2. Digital technologies for maximum precision and predictability.
3. Artificial intelligence as the next stage of personalized dentistry.
Together, these factors form a new standard of treatment, combining scientific innovation and practical results – stable, functional, and aesthetically perfect implants.